7 Claim-Killing Mistakes

The 7 Mistakes That Kill Faulty Goods Claims

Most faulty goods claims that fail do so for avoidable procedural reasons — not because the consumer lacked rights. These are the seven errors that retailers rely on, and how the Faulty Goods Fight-Back System eliminates each one.

Mistake 1

Accepting a repair when you are entitled to a full refund

Within the first 30 days after purchase, you have the right to a full refund under the short-term right to reject — no repair, no replacement, no argument. Retailers routinely offer a repair at this stage because it is cheaper for them. Accepting it voluntarily waives your refund right. The System's Escalation Dead-Line Calendar shows exactly which right applies on which day so you never accept less than you are owed.

Mistake 2

Falling into the Repair Loop Trap

The Repair Loop Trap is the cycle where a retailer attempts repeated repairs — returning goods each time as 'fixed' — without resolving the underlying fault. Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, one failed repair entitles you to escalate to a replacement or price reduction. Many consumers allow three, four, or more repair attempts. Once you recognise the trap, the System shows you how to document each cycle and issue a formal escalation notice.

Mistake 3

Not keeping a written record of in-store conversations

If a shop assistant tells you verbally that they will refund, replace, or investigate — and later denies it — you have no evidence. The System instructs you to follow every in-store conversation with a written summary email to the retailer within 24 hours: 'Following our conversation today, I am confirming that you agreed to…' This creates an admissible record. Without it, the conversation never happened.

Mistake 4

Missing the six-month and six-year evidence thresholds

UK consumer rights operate across three time windows — 30 days, six months, and six years. Missing the six-month threshold is the most common and most costly error: after six months, the burden of proof shifts from the retailer to you. You must then show the fault was present at purchase, which typically requires an independent assessment. The Escalation Dead-Line Calendar in the System tracks all three windows from your purchase date automatically.

Mistake 5

Confusing retailer responsibility with manufacturer warranty

Your statutory rights run against the retailer, not the manufacturer. A retailer who tells you to 'contact the manufacturer' or 'it's under warranty, not our problem' is deflecting unlawfully. Your contract is with the seller. Manufacturer warranties are additional to — not a replacement for — your statutory rights. The System includes a template response to this deflection.

Mistake 6

Not invoking Section 75 on credit card purchases

If you paid by credit card and the item cost between £100 and £30,000, your credit card provider is jointly liable with the retailer under Section 75 of the Consumer Credit Act 1974. This applies even if you only put a deposit on the card. Most consumers do not know this right exists, or do not know how to invoke it correctly. The System includes the exact Section 75 claim letter.

Mistake 7

Submitting an incomplete Five-Component Evidence Pack to ADR

Alternative Dispute Resolution adjudicators make decisions on the documents submitted. A missing correspondence log, an undated fault record, or a proof of purchase in the wrong format can result in a finding against you — not because your rights were absent but because your evidence was. The Five-Component Evidence Pack template in the System ensures every ADR submission is structurally complete before it leaves your hands.

Avoid Every One of These Mistakes

The Faulty Goods Fight-Back System includes the Escalation Dead-Line Calendar, all seven template responses, and the Five-Component Evidence Pack — structured to prevent every error on this list.

Get the System — £27